ArticlePolymers2025
Improvement in the Damping Behavior of Hierarchical Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic for Park Golf Club Faces.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Park golf, introduced to Korea in 2000, has become a popular leisure activity, especially among older people. However, sudden shock between the ball and carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) face can increase the risk of injuries, highlighting the need for enhanced damping material. However, restitution and damping are critical properties of golf clubs and often exhibit a conflicting relationship; thus, a method is needed to address this challenge. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a CFRP with an enhanced restitution and damping ratio by incorporating carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide nanofillers into the existing CFRP face material. A drop test apparatus was set up to measure the coefficient of restitution, and the damping properties were evaluated using a pencil lead-breaking test. CNTs exhibited high rebound properties due to their stiffness and hardness. In contrast, GO provided a modest increase in rebound while demonstrating a superior damping ratio, attributed to its layered structure and high internal friction. Based on these results, the optimal nanofiller content was determined as GO 0.025 wt%, showing a minor improvement in rebound performance, a 1033% improvement in vibration damping, and an 84% improvement in acoustic damping. Notably, this finding implies the importance of nanomaterial shape and its interaction with the composite matrix. A double-masked user test with a prototype confirmed enhanced comfort and reduced vibration feedback. The low-vibration components developed in this study are expected to be applicable in future research for controlling the damping ratio under impact or vibrations, such as UAM and helicopters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.