Older Adults' Experiences of Institutional Eating and Dining: A Qualitative Study on Mealtimes in Adult Day Centers.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Determinants of Direct Support Professionals' Mealtime Experiences in an Israeli Long-Term Care Facility for Residents with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Nutrients · 2026
   Article
2. Intergenerational Mealtimes in Adult Day Care Settings: Impact of a Pilot Randomised Control Study on the Well-Being, Health, and Food Intake of Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
3. Food-evoked nostalgia as a mediator between food-related satisfaction and psychological distress among older adults: a structural equation modeling approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as