Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39940233›Full record

ArticleNutrients2025

Food Group Consumption and Nutrient Intake by Breastfeeding Women: Comparison to Current Dietary Guidelines and Nutrient Recommendations.

Ying Jin, Jane Coad, Louise Brough

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying JinSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0840-773X
Jane CoadSchool of Food Technology and Natural Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-8256
Louise BroughSchool of Food Technology and Natural Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0911-5384

Funding

Massey University Research Fund n/aSchool of Food and Advanced Technology postgraduate Fund n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesOptimal nutrition is essential for the health of breastfeeding women and their infants. This study aimed to assess food and nutrient intake and alignment with nutrition guidelines for breastfeeding women living in New Zealand.

methodsSeventy-six breastfeeding women were enrolled in the longitudinal Mother and Infant Nutrition Investigation study and completed a weighed four-day diet diary including supplement use at three months postpartum. The number of servings consumed for each food group were calculated based on the 2020 Eating and Activity Guidelines for New Zealand Adults. Nutrient intakes were compared to the nutrient reference values for Australia and New Zealand.

resultsOverall, the percentages of women who met the recommended number of servings for fruits, vegetables, grain foods, meats and milk/milk products were 25%, 0%, 5%, 34%, and 13%, respectively. None of women met the current recommendations for all food groups. Many participants had intakes below the estimated average requirement or adequate intake and were at risk of nutrient inadequacy for vitamin E (55%), vitamin D (53%), manganese (61%), and selenium (55%).

conclusionsBreastfeeding women had a low alignment with the current dietary guidelines and were at risk of an inadequate intake of vitamin E, D, manganese, and selenium. Research to investigate the barriers and enablers of healthy food choices is needed.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingDietNutrition PolicyRecommended Dietary AllowancesAdultAustraliaDiet RecordsFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesNew ZealandNutrientsNutritional RequirementsYoung AdultNutrientsbreastfeedingdiet alignment to guidelinesfood and nutrient adequacyfood groupsnutrient intakenutrient toxicity

Identifiers

PMID39940233
PMCPMC11819999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.