ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Fabrication and Optimization of Additively Manufactured Hybrid Nanogenerators for Wearable Devices.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Surface Texture in Additively Manufactured Biocompatible Materials and Triboelectric Behavior.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancing Nanogenerators: The Role of 3D-Printed Nanocomposites in Energy Harvesting.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper aims to fabricate a hybrid piezoelectric/triboelectric nanogenerator via fusion deposition modeling as a proof of concept in the wearable device industry. The nanogenerator structure consists of a TPU/ZnO nanocomposite and an Ecoflex layer. The nanocomposite layer is fabricated using two different weight percentages (15 wt% and 20 wt%) and poled piezoelectric sheets, generating 2.63 V to 3.46 V. Variations regarding the nanogenerator's physical parameters were implemented to examine the effect on nanogenerator performance under different frequencies. The hybrid nanogenerator enabled energy harvesting for wearable devices. It was strapped on the side of the wrist to generate a potential difference with the motion of the wrist, creating a contact separation piezoelectric/triboelectric nanogenerator. Furthermore, a piezoelectric sheet was placed at the bottom of the wrist to harvest energy. The hybrid nanogenerator provided a maximum triboelectric response of 5.75 V and a maximum piezoelectric response of 2.85 V during wrist motion. The piezoelectric nanogenerator placed at the bottom of the wrist generated up to 4.78 V per wrist motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.