ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Functional outcome after Brachytherapy with bi-nuclide (Ru-106/Iodine-125) plaques in large uveal melanomas.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term outcome after treatment of large uveal melanoma.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePreservation of visual acuity remains a challenging issue after globe sparing therapy of large uveal melanoma. The aim of our study was analyzing the functional outcome after brachytherapy with bi-nuclide plaques (BBNP), maintaining prognostic factors for legal blindness (LB).
methodsWe have analyzed all consecutive patients with large uveal melanoma treated with BBNP at our institution between 01/1999 and 12/2020. The post-treatment follow-up data were screened up to 06/2023. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for development of LB following BBNP.
resultsOverall, 570 patients with median age of 65.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 54.5-74.0) underwent BBNP. During the median post-treatment follow-up of 30.8 months (IQR: 12.9-57.3), LB was diagnosed in 287 (50.4%) patients. Patients' age (> 67 years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.58, 95%-confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-2.00, p < 0.0001), tumor thickness (> 8.5 mm, aHR = 1.43, 95%-CI = 1.12-1.82, p = 0.004), VA (> 0.5 LogMAR, aHR = 1.59, 95%-CI = 1.25-2.02, p < 0.0001), and ciliary body involvement (aHR = 0.77, 95%-CI = 0.60-0.97, p = 0.029) were confirmed as independent predictors of LB in the final multivariable Cox regression analysis.
conclusionsApproximately a half of patients with large uveal melanoma develop LB around 2.5 years after brachytherapy. Further optimization of treatment strategies, including both therapeutic and preventive measures, has the potential to enhance the functional outcome after episcleral plaque therapy for large UMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.