ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Anti-glycaemic effect of the Chinese modified DASH diet combined with 23% low-sodium salt in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes: a clinical trial.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gender-specific protective effects of dietary index for gut microbiota on cardiovascular disease: insights from NHANES 2007-2020.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough many previous trials have formalized the blood glucose-lowering effect of the DASH diet, relevant reports in China remain limited. This study aimed to explore the anti-hyperglycaemic effect of the Chinese Modified Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet combined with 23% low-sodium salt and meal packs in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled single-blinded trial with a semi-open design; 100 participants were randomly assigned to Group A (control), Group B (23% low-sodium salt), and Group C (meal packs) for 8 weeks of dietary intervention. All participants were followed up weekly to collect glycaemia data (standardized meal tolerance test), salt use, and adverse events.
resultsGeneralized estimating equation analysis indicated that fasting blood glucose decreased in all three groups following the intervention when compared to baseline. Group A decreased by 0.72 mmol/L (P = 0.008), while Groups B and C decreased by 2.02 mmol/L and 2.06 mmol/L, respectively (both P < 0.001). Although the latter two groups experienced greater reductions than Group A, the differences among the groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.450). For postprandial blood glucose, Group C showed the most pronounced decrease. The three groups recorded reductions of 2.43 mmol/L, 2.52 mmol/L, and 4.29 mmol/L, respectively (all P < 0.001), with again no significant difference observed between the groups (P = 0.088). The most notable enhancement in postprandial glucose was observed in Group C, which demonstrated a 51.5% improvement in its control rate. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. No serious adverse events occurred during the trial.
conclusionThe CM-DASH diet combined with 23% low-sodium salt and meal packs demonstrates potentially beneficial effects on glycemic control in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes. This intervention reduces salt intake and fosters the development of healthy eating habits, thereby contributing to the improvement of patients' blood glucose. However, larger studies are necessary to confirm these findings. Trial registration ChiCTR2000029017. Registered January 11, 2020-Prospective registration, http://www.chictr.org.cn/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.