Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939964›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Time trends in the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse across the BRICS: an age-period-cohort analysis for the GBD 2019.

Yuting Xu, Shudong Xie, Chengyu Zhou, Liping Zhu, Yao Tong, Alvaro Munoz, Yuhang Wu, Xuhong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuting Xu *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shudong Xie *Transplantation Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chengyu ZhouDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Liping ZhuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yao TongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Alvaro MunozCentro Universitario del Norte, Universidad de Guadalajara, Carretera Federal No. 23, Km. 191, Colotlán, Jalisco, Mexico.
Yuhang WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 226901015@csu.edu.cn.
Xuhong LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. lixh0901@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Hunan Province 2023SK2038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a female-specific health problem, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) causes serious damage to the physical and psychological health of numerous women, which poses a significant challenge to women's health care worldwide, especially in developing countries. We conducted an in-depth analysis of trends in the incidence of POP over the past 30 years globally and in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS countries). MATERIALS AND

methodsData on the incidence of POP were obtained by location (5 countries), age (15-94 years old), year (1990-2019) from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Age-period-cohort model was used to estimate the net drift, local drift, age effects, period and cohort effects between 1990 and 2019.

resultsThe all-age incidence rate for POP in 2019 increased from 283.28/100,000 (95% UI: 229.97, 340.34) in China to 444.81/100,000 (369.92, 526.15) in Brazil, whereas the age-standardized incidence rate in 2019 was highest in India 400.06/100,000 (325.98, 476.91) and lowest in China 187.74/100,000 (154.21, 224.43). There was an emerging transition of incidences from the young population (15-39 years) to the middle and older population (≥ 40 years) in Brazil and India. The current findings reflect the different age, period, and cohort effects on POP incidence trends at global and BRICS levels.

conclusionsThe BRICS countries have made different progress in reducing the prevalence of POP. We fully recognize the diversity of internal environments in the BRICS countries and suggest an incremental approach to advancing POP prevention matters based on possible policy-driven human and financial resources in a given setting.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrazilChinaCohort StudiesFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceIndiaMiddle AgedAge-period-cohortIncidencePelvic organ prolapseTrend

Identifiers

PMID39939964
PMCPMC11823164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.