ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of platelet transfusion and bleeding risk stratification in patients with immune thrombocytopenia before procedures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Determinants of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Platelet Transfusion for Patients with Cancer: An Update.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Immune thrombocytopenic purpura as a predictor of postoperative complications in total knee arthroplasty: A nationwide cohort study.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Genetic Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Disease: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimal model for predicting intraoperative blood transfusion in elective surgery patients: a comparative study of eight machine learning methods.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The main treatment goal for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is bleeding risk reduction, particularly during procedures. While adjusting platelet thresholds with ITP treatments is recommended, platelet transfusions are commonly used despite controversial benefits. We evaluated the effectiveness of platelet transfusion in reducing post-procedure bleeding risk and identified predictive indicators of bleeding. A nationally representative database was used to develop a model predicting post-procedure bleeding risk in patients with ITP. Machine learning analyses, including random forest feature importance and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values, assessed 34 risk factors, including the platelet transfusion amount. The random forest model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 93.6%. Key variables influencing bleeding risk included platelet transfusion amount, high-risk procedure, anticoagulant use, anemia, age, ITP treatment, and newly diagnosed ITP, all positively correlated with bleeding risk. Conversely, no antiplatelet or anticoagulant use and moderate- or low-risk procedures were negatively associated with bleeding risk. SHAP plots showed that platelet transfusion amount correlated with high-risk procedures, and bleeding risk increased with age in high-risk procedures. Bleeding risk in patients with ITP is primarily determined by procedural risk and patient condition, rather than platelet transfusion. Minimizing unnecessary platelet transfusions and addressing bleeding risk factors pre-procedure is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.