ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of the effects of gender on lower extremity kinematics following a 5 km running time trial in collegiate recreational runners.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore whether collegiate recreational runners of different genders exhibit different lower extremity kinematics following a 5 km running time trial. Thirty collegiate recreational runners (15 males, 15 females) participated. The participants performed kinematic tests using IMUs before and after the 5 km running time trial. Spatiotemporal parameters were recorded via the Garmin HRM-RUN during the 5 km running time trial. The peak hip, knee and ankle joint angles and angular velocity were compared within and between groups using two-way analysis of variance. Spatiotemporal parameters were compared between groups using independent t tests. In terms of kinematic parameters, gender and time have a significant interaction effect on the peak knee internal rotation angle (P = 0.036) after 5 km running time trial. The peak ankle eversion angular velocity after running was significantly greater than that before running in male runners (P = 0.015). In terms of spatiotemporal parameters, the average cadence of females was significantly greater than that of males during running (P = 0.003). The Collegiate recreational runners presented gender-specific lower extremity kinematic characteristics following a 5 km running time trial. The peak knee internal rotation angle significantly increased after the 5 km running time trial in female runners. It should be paid more attention to the association between gender-specific lower extremity kinematic characteristics and running-related injuries in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.