ArticleScientific reports2025
Orthogonal neural representations support perceptual judgments of natural stimuli.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stable readout of visual representations mediates flexible generalization.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Exploring neural manifolds across a wide range of intrinsic dimensions.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Sequential experience reshapes population representations in visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neural population geometry and optimal coding of tasks with shared latent structure.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Synergistic Geniculate and Cortical Dynamics Facilitate a Decorrelated Spatial Frequency Code in the Early Visual System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Measuring Stimulus Information Transfer Between Neural Populations Through the Communication Subspace.Neural computation · 2025Article
- Measuring Stimulus Information Transfer Between Neural Populations through the Communication Subspace.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In natural visually guided behavior, observers must separate relevant information from a barrage of irrelevant information. Many studies have investigated the neural underpinnings of this ability using artificial stimuli presented on blank backgrounds. Natural images, however, contain task-irrelevant background elements that might interfere with the perception of object features. Recent studies suggest that visual feature estimation can be modeled through the linear decoding of task-relevant information from visual cortex. So, if the representations of task-relevant and irrelevant features are not orthogonal in the neural population, then variation in the task-irrelevant features would impair task performance. We tested this hypothesis using human psychophysics and monkey neurophysiology combined with parametrically variable naturalistic stimuli. We demonstrate that (1) the neural representation of one feature (the position of an object) in visual area V4 is orthogonal to those of several background features, (2) the ability of human observers to precisely judge object position was largely unaffected by those background features, and (3) many features of the object and the background (and of objects from a separate stimulus set) are orthogonally represented in V4 neural population responses. Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that orthogonal neural representations can support stable perception of object features despite the richness of natural visual scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.