ArticleScientific reports2025
Steering drilling wellbore trajectory prediction based on the NOA-LSTM-FCNN method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aiming at the problem that it is difficult to accurately predict wellbore trajectory under complex geological conditions, the NOA-LSTM-FCNN prediction method for steering drilling wellbore trajectory is proposed by combining NOA, LSTM and FCNN. This method adopts LSTM layer to receive input data and capture long-term dependencies within the data, extracting important information. The FCNN layer performs nonlinear mapping on the output of the LSTM layer and further extracts relevant features to enhance prediction accuracy. NOA is employed for hyperparameter optimization of the LSTM-FCNN model. The experimental results show that the prediction effect of the proposed method is better than that of other methods. Taking the prediction results of the well deviation angle of H21 as an example, compared with traditional machine learning methods (LR, SVM and BP) and deep learning methods (CNN, LSTM and GRU), the evaluation index R² of this method was improved by 0.17887, 0.03129, 0.0259, 0.00054, 0.00032 and 0.00031 respectively, showing significant prediction accuracy advantages and strong adaptability. In addition, it applies to various types of wellbore trajectory data, effectively enhancing wellbore trajectory prediction capabilities under complex geological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.