Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939651›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Examining emotion reactivity to politically polarizing media in a randomized controlled trial of mindfulness training versus active coping training.

Hadley Rahrig, Polina Beloborodova, Christina Castro, Kayla Sabet, Melina Johnson, Orion Pearce, Elif Celik, Kirk Warren Brown

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hadley RahrigDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 625 W. Washington Ave, Madison, WI, 53703, USA. hrahrig@wisc.edu.
Polina BeloborodovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 625 W. Washington Ave, Madison, WI, 53703, USA.
Christina CastroDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Kayla SabetDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Melina JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Orion PearceDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Elif CelikDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Kirk Warren BrownDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN EMOTION RESEARCHT32MH018931 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Richard J Davidson · 1989 to 2026
$11.6M
National Institute of Health 5T32MH018931-33NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional appraisals of political stimuli (e.g., videos) have been shown to drive shared neural encoding, which correspond to shared, yet divisive, interpretations of such stimuli. However, mindfulness practice may entrain a form of emotion regulation that de-automatizes social biases, possibly through alteration of such neural mechanisms. The present study combined a naturalistic neuroimaging paradigm and a randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of short-term mindfulness training (MT) (n = 35) vs structurally equivalent Cognitive Reappraisal training (CT) (n = 37) on politically-situated emotions while evaluating the mechanistic role of prefrontal cortical neural synchrony. Participants underwent functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) recording while viewing inflammatory partisan news clips and continuously rating their momentary discrete emotions. MT participants were more likely to respond with extreme levels of anger (odds ratio = 0.12, p < 0.001) and disgust (odds ratio = 0.08, p < 0.001) relative to CT participants. Neural synchrony-based analyses suggested that participants with extreme emotion reactions exhibited greater prefrontal cortical neural synchrony, but that this pattern was less prominent in participants receiving MT relative to CT (CT > MT; channel 1 ISC = 0.040, p = 0.030).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalEmotionsMindfulnessAdultFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39939651
PMCPMC11822039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.