Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939621›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Real-world data analysis for factors influencing the quality check status in FoundationOne CDx cancer genomic profiling tests.

Hiroaki Niitsu, Hikaru Nakahara, Katsunari Ishida, Yoshie Kaneko, C Nelson Hayes, Koji Arihiro, Takao Hinoi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiroaki NiitsuDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hikaru NakaharaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Katsunari IshidaDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yoshie KanekoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
C Nelson HayesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Koji ArihiroDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takao HinoiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. thinoi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing is used worldwide for personalized cancer treatment. Unstained slides from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks are required for tissue-based CGP testing. However, the use of low quality FFPE specimens can result in testing failure or invalid results. Although several previous studies have indicated that the quality of genomic testing is affected by various factors, the factor(s) that has the greatest influence on CGP testing has not been well studied in real-world data. Thus, we conducted a large-scale multi-institutional study in Hiroshima, Japan to investigate the factors associated with quality check status in FoundationOne CDx CGP testing using real-world data from 1,204 participants from an area with a population of approximately 2.7 million. This study revealed low percentage of tumor nuclei in FFPE specimen, long-term storage of FFPE block, and pancreatic cancer as independent risk factors for qualified status. Of the three factors, percentage of tumor nuclei had the largest effect on quality check status, while the magnitudes of the effects of storage time of FFPE or pancreatic cancer were minor. Collectively, our real-world data indicate that tumor purity is the most important factor for successful CGP, and we would suggest greater than 35% as an ideal percentage of tumor nuclei for CGP submission.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenetic TestingGenomicsNeoplasmsAgedData AnalysisFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsParaffin EmbeddingQuality ControlTissue FixationCancer genomic profilingFoundationOne CDxQuality checkSolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID39939621
PMCPMC11822185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.