ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Discussion on the validity of commonly used reliability indices in sports medicine and exercise science: a critical review with data simulations.
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reliability, Device Agreement and Validity of Load-Velocity Profiles: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Validity and Reliability of Portable Blood Lactate Analyzers: A Systematic Review with COSMIN and GRADE Assessment.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Should pre-measurement physical activity be standardized in muscle thickness and stiffness evaluations? - A randomized controlled four arm cross-over study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Trial
- How much habituation is enough? An R application for ad hoc content-related limits of acceptance in behavioral research.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Reliability and device objectivity in oscillatory blood pressure measurement - a measurement error analysis to inform clinical decision making.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Does task experience moderate habituation effects in drop jumps? - An intra- and interday reliability and measurement error analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Stronger hearts, weaker leaps? The cardiac power paradox in elite soccer.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between maximal lower leg strength and static and dynamic balance as well as gait velocity in older adults.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Can measurement errors explain variance in the relationship between muscle- and tendon stiffness and range of motion?-a blinded reliability and objectivity study.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- The Effects of Familiarisation on Countermovement Jumps with Handheld Dumbbell Accentuated Eccentric Loading in Youth Athletes.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Non-invasive Real-Time Hemodynamic Monitoring During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Series.Cureus · 2025Article
- When Testing Becomes Learning-Underscoring the Relevance of Habituation to Improve Internal Validity of Common Neurocognitive Tests.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Examiner experience moderates reliability of human lower extremity muscle ultrasound measurement - a double blinded measurement error study.The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
- Augmented and prematurely occurring H-reflex recovery curve shows enhanced spinal network excitability in ALS patients when employing the double stimulation paradigm.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apart from objectivity and validity, reliability is considered a precondition for testing within scientific works, as unreliable testing protocols limit conclusions, especially for practical application. Classification guidelines commonly refer to relative reliability, focusing on Pearson correlation coefficients (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.