ArticleHormones (Athens, Greece)2025
Development and validation of a new diagnostic prediction model for NAFLD based on machine learning algorithms in NHANES 2017-2020.3.
Article in Hormones (Athens, Greece), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of machine learning in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model using routine laboratory biomarkers for identifying prevalent MASLD: Evidence from two observational studies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Psoas Muscle Index, Systemic Inflammation, and Liver Fibrosis in MAFLD: A Case-Control Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a multisystem disease that can trigger the metabolic syndrome. Early prevention and treatment of NAFLD is still a huge challenge for patients and clinicians. The aim of this study was to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-based predictive models. The model with optimal performance would be developed as a set of simple arithmetic tools for predicting the risk of NAFLD individually.
methodsStatistical analyses were performed in 2428 individuals extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, cycle 2017-2020.3) database. Feature variables were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Seven ML algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were used to construct models based on the feature variables and evaluate their performance. The model with the best performance was transformed into a diagnostic predictive nomogram (DPN). The DPN was developed into an online calculator and an Excel algorithm tool. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and subgroup analyses were used to compare and assess the predictive abilities of the DPN and six existing NAFLD predictive models, including the ZJU index, the hepatic steatosis index (HSI), the triglyceride-glucose index (TyG), the Framingham steatosis index (FSI), the fatty liver index (FLI), and the visceral adiposity index (VAI).
resultsAmong the 2428 participants, the prevalence of NAFLD was 47.45%. LASSO regression identified eight variables from 39 variables, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglyceride (TG), diabetes, hypertension, uric acid (UA), and race. Among the models constructed by the seven algorithms mentioned above, the LR-based model performed the best, demonstrating outstanding performance in terms of area under the curve (AUC, 0.823), accuracy (0.754), precision (0.768), specificity (0.804), and positive predictive value (0.768). It was then transformed into the DPN, which was successfully developed as an online calculator and an Excel algorithm tool. The diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.856, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.839-0.874, and AUC 0.823, 95% CI 0.793-0.854, respectively) and net clinical benefit of DPN in the training and validation sets were superior to those of the ZJU, HSI, TyG, FSI, FLI, and VAI. The results were maintained in subgroup analyses.
conclusionsThe LR model based on ML was developed, exhibiting good performance. DPN can be used as an individualized tool for rapid detection of NAFLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39939537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.