ReviewPediatric research2025
Novel biomarkers of fetal and neonatal environmental exposure, effect and susceptibility.
Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal neurocritical care considerations for prenatally identified neurological disorders.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Prenatal and postnatal atrazine-induced endocrine and ovarian chemical biotransformation protein disruption in offspring.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- The DO-KB knowledgebase 2026 update: expanding programmatic and language access.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid advancements in science and technology have allowed medical providers to treat wider ranges of diseases with safer and more effective therapies than ever before. One of the areas of health that has been consistently understudied, however, is one that affects us all: environmental health or the effects that the chemicals we are exposed to every day have on our acute and chronic health. This effect can be exacerbated during and shortly after pregnancy, as an individual exposure is often shared by both the mother and the fetus/neonate. The diagnosis and monitoring of chemical exposure can be quite challenging, and improving our understanding of the effects of exposure will therefore require effective use of an expanding set of biomarker tests and biological matrices. This review covers the background and history of neonatal biomarkers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility, focusing on the potential uses for the non-invasive matrix of exhaled breath for the detection and monitoring of chemical exposures. IMPACT: Provides a brief overview of Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health Joint Leadership Council BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Summarizes new and potential biomarkers for fetal exposure. Collates studies using breath as a matrix for environmental exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.