ArticleDrug safety2025
Assessment of Pharmacovigilance Across University Hospitals in Morocco.
Article in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite the increased scrutiny on vaccine safety following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Morocco's Centre of Antipoison and Pharmacovigilance (CAPM) remained concerned that the pharmacovigilance system in Morocco was insufficiently implemented, including limited adverse event (AE) reporting, poor data use, and inconsistent training nationwide.
objectivesWe sought to assess the status of pharmacovigilance activities (PAs) prior to formally institutionalizing them across university hospital centers (UHCs), given their position as the main providers of healthcare in Morocco and key sources for reporting serious AEs.
methodsWe assessed seven UHCs (housing 30 hospitals) in 2023 using a structured questionnaire with pharmacovigilance focal points developed from the World Health Organization's indicators of pharmacovigilance and the Global Benchmarking Tool. Data were grouped into 28 PAs and scored from 0 (not implemented) to 3 (fully implemented). We then calculated an implementation rate for each site on the basis of percent of PAs fully implemented (≥ 70%, well established; > 40% to < 70%, partially implemented; and ≤ 40%, not implemented). A desk review was also performed at the sites. Using the results of the assessment, three working groups of pharmacovigilance stakeholders developed recommendations to be formally adopted by UHCs.
resultsBasic elements of pharmacovigilance (notification forms and VigiFlow
conclusionsThe assessment revealed a subgroup of centers with well-established AE signal detection and causality assessment abilities, which could play a leading role in the country. After the site assessment, our collaborative approach of bringing together focal points to identify next steps and generate buy-in helped to formalize pharmacovigilance across centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.