Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939511›Full record

ReviewDrugs2025

From Prospective Evaluation to Practice: Model-Informed Dose Optimization in Oncology.

Bram C Agema, Birgit C P Koch, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. AI-powered in silico twins: redefining precision medicine through simulation, personalization, and predictive healthcare.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bram C AgemaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.agema@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-2911
Birgit C P KochRotterdam Clinical Pharmacometrics Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One dose does not fit all, especially in oncolytic drugs, where side effects and therapy failures highlight the need for personalized dosing approaches. In recent years, the quest to apply model-informed precision dosing to oncology drugs has gained significant momentum, reflecting its potential to revolutionize patient care by tailoring treatments to individual pharmacokinetic profiles. Despite this progress, model-informed precision dosing has not (yet) become widely integrated into routine clinical care. We aimed to explain model-informed precision dosing from a clinical viewpoint while addressing all prospective model-informed precision dosing implementation and validation studies in the field of oncology. We identified 16 different drugs for which prospective model-informed precision dosing validation/implementation has been performed. Although these studies are mostly focused on attaining adequate drug exposures and reducing inter-individual variability, improved clinical outcomes after performing model-informed precision dosing were shown for busulfan, and high-dose methotrexate. Toxicities were significantly reduced for busulfan and cyclophosphamide treatment. In contrast, for carboplatin, for which model-informed precision dosing has been used in the Calvert formula, no prospective validation on outcomes was deemed necessary as the therapeutic window had been extensively validated. Model-informed precision dosing has shown to be of added value in oncology and is expected to significantly change dosing regimens in the future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMedical OncologyPrecision MedicineProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39939511
PMCPMC11946950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.