ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2025
Flupyradifurone, imidacloprid and clothianidin disrupt the auditory processing in the locust CNS.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flupyradifurone impairs the processing of sound signals by the ascending interneurons AN1 and AN2 that convey auditory information to the cricket brain.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
- The flavonoid rutin protects against imidacloprid-induced osmotic and electric disruptions in Africanized honey bees.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the EU banned classic neonicotinoids like imidacloprid and clothianidin, they may be replaced by more recently marketed insecticides such as flupyradifurone. However, they all operate on the same neuropharmacological principle as selective agonists at the insect's nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Here we investigated the impact of flupyradifurone, imidacloprid and clothianidin on the neuronal processing in the auditory pathway of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. While stepwise increasing the insecticide concentration in the haemolymph, we extracellularly recorded the spike responses of auditory afferents in the tympanal nerve and of auditory interneurons in the neck connectives. All three insecticides showed a very similar dose-dependent suppression of spike responses in the auditory interneurons ascending towards the brain, whereas the spike responses in the sensory neurons of the ears appeared unaffected. Furthermore, by systematic injection experiments we demonstrate that insecticide dosages which already supress the information transfer in the auditory pathway are by far too low to induce the typical poisoning symptoms like trembling, spasms, and paralysis. We discuss how sublethal intoxication with classical neonicotinoids or functionally related insecticides like flupyradifurone may disrupt the postsynaptic balance between excitation and inhibition in the auditory pathway of locusts and other orthopteran insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.