Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939425›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

A multicenter diagnostic study of thyroid nodule with Hashimoto's thyroiditis enabled by Hashimoto's thyroiditis nodule-artificial intelligence model.

Chen Chen, Yahan Zhou, Bo Xu, Lingyan Zhou, Mei Song, Shengxing Yuan, Wenwen Yue, Yibo Zhou, Hangjun Chen, Ruyi Yan and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Chen Chen *Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Yahan Zhou *Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Therapy (Taizhou), Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taizhou, China.
Bo Xu *Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Therapy (Taizhou), Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taizhou, China.
Lingyan ZhouDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Mei SongDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Shengxing YuanDepartment of Ultrasonography, Qujing No.1 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Qujing, China.
Wenwen YueCenter of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yibo ZhouJinhua Municipal Central Hospital Medical Group (Medical Center), Jinhua, China.
Hangjun ChenJinhua Municipal Central Hospital Medical Group (Medical Center), Jinhua, China.
Ruyi YanDepartment of Ultrasonography, Qujing No.1 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Qujing, China.
Benlong XiaoDepartment of Ultrasonography, Qujing No.1 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Qujing, China.
Tian JiangDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Qi ZhangShaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Shanshan ZhaoShaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Changsong XuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People' s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, China.
Chenke XuAffiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiao LuThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Lin SuiDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Yuqi YanDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Mingshun LyuZhoushan Hospital, Zhoushan, China.
Qingquan HeCenter of Intelligent Diagnosis and Therapy (Taizhou), Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taizhou, China.
Vicky Yang WangCenter of Intelligent Diagnosis and Therapy (Taizhou), Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taizhou, China. wangyang@waiim.org.cn.
Dong XuDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China. xudong@zjcc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-240X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a Hashimoto's thyroiditis nodule-artificial intelligence (HTN-AI) model to optimize the diagnosis of thyroid nodules with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) of which the efficiency and accuracy remain challenging. DESIGN AND

methodsThis study included 5709 patients from 10 hospitals between January 2014 and March 2024. Among them, 5053 thyroid nodules were divided into training and testing sets in a 9:1 ratio. Then, we tested the model on an external dataset (n = 432). Finally, we prospectively recruited 224 patients with dynamic ultrasound videos acquired and employed the HTN-AI model to identify nodules from the dynamic ultrasound videos. Radiologists of varying seniority performed the categorization of thyroid nodules as benign and malignant, both with and without the assistance of the HTN-AI model, and their diagnostic performances were compared.

resultsThe results indicated that for the external testing set, the HTN-AI model achieved a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.91, outperforming several other common convolutional neural network (CNN) models. Specifically, the DSCs of the HTN-AI model were similar for thyroid nodule patients with and without HT which were 0.91 ± 0.06 and 0.91 ± 0.09. Moreover, when the HTN-AI model was used to assist diagnosis, it demonstrated an improvement in the diagnostic performance of radiologists. The diagnostic areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of the junior radiologists increased from 0.59, 0.59, and 0.57 to 0.68, 0.65, and 0.65.

conclusionsThis research demonstrates that the HTN-AI model has excellent performance in identifying thyroid nodules associated with HT and can assist radiologists with more accurate and efficient diagnoses of thyroid nodules. KEY POINTS: Question The study developed an HTN-AI model aimed at assisting in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules in patients with HT. Findings The HTN-AI model achieved great performance with a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.91, and consistent performance across patients with and without HT. Clinical relevance The HTN-AI model enhances the accuracy and efficiency of thyroid nodule diagnosis, particularly in patients with HT. By assisting radiologists at varying experience levels, this model supports improved decision-making in the management of thyroid nodules.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHashimoto DiseaseThyroid NoduleAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerProspective StudiesUltrasonographyDeep learningDiagnostic imagingHashimoto’s thyroiditisThyroid noduleUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.