Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939421›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Potential of photon-counting detector CT technology for contrast medium reduction in portal venous phase thoracoabdominal CT.

Daniel Popp, Martin Siedlecki, Lena Friedrich, Mark Haerting, Christian Scheurig-Muenkler, Florian Schwarz, Thomas Kroencke, Stefanie Bette, Josua A Decker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel PoppDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Martin SiedleckiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Lena FriedrichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Mark HaertingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Christian Scheurig-MuenklerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Florian SchwarzInstitute for Radiology, DONAUISAR Hospital Deggendorf-Dingolfing-Landau, Deggendorf, Germany.
Thomas KroenckeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. Thomas.Kroencke@uk-augsburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4889-1036
Stefanie Bette *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Josua A Decker *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare image quality and iodine attenuation intra-individually in portal venous phase photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) scans using protocols with different contrast medium (CM) volume. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospectively acquired patient cohort between 04/2021 and 11/2023 was retrospectively screened if patients had the following combination of portal venous phase thoracoabdominal CT scans: (a) PCD-CT with 120 mL CM volume (PCD-CT

resultsThe final study cohort comprised 49 patients (mean age 67 [31-86] years, 12 female). Comparison to EID-CT was available in 33 patients. In standard 70 keV VMI reconstructions, PCD-CT

conclusionIn portal venous phase thoracoabdominal PCD-CT, a nearly 17% reduction in CM was achievable while maintaining subjective and objective image quality compared to prior higher CM volume PCD-CT scans within the same patients and still surpassing image quality of previous exams on an EID-CT system. KEY POINTS: Question How do image quality and iodine attenuation intra-individually compare in portal venous phase photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) scans using protocols with different contrast medium volume. Findings PCD-CT scans exhibit superior quantitative and qualitative image quality compared to energy-integrating detector-CT acquisitions and are not negatively affected by contrast volume reductions up to 17%. Clinical relevance This study provides further evidence that PCD-CT enables a considerable reduction in iodine dose for portal venous phase acquisition, benefiting both patients and healthcare system costs.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaPortal VeinRadiography, AbdominalRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotonsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioContrast MediaContrast mediumIodine contrastOncologic imagingPhoton-counting detector computed tomographyVirtual monoenergetic imaging

Identifiers

PMID39939421
PMCPMC12226673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.