ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Improved segmentation of hepatic vascular networks in ultrasound volumes using 3D U-Net with intensity transformation-based data augmentation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dendritic U-Net for robust vascular wall segmentation in ultrasound imaging.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Editorial: AI4US Special Issue.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Prediction of bone oligometastases in breast cancer using models based on deep learning radiomics of PET/CT imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate three-dimensional (3D) segmentation of hepatic vascular networks is crucial for supporting ultrasound-mediated theranostics for liver diseases. Despite advancements in deep learning techniques, accurate segmentation remains challenging due to ultrasound image quality issues, including intensity and contrast fluctuations. This study introduces intensity transformation-based data augmentation methods to improve deep convolutional neural network-based segmentation of hepatic vascular networks. We employed a 3D U-Net, which leverages spatial contextual information, as the baseline. To address intensity and contrast fluctuations and improve 3D U-Net performance, we implemented data augmentation using high-contrast intensity transformation with S-shaped tone curves and low-contrast intensity transformation with Gamma and inverse S-shaped tone curves. We conducted validation experiments on 78 ultrasound volumes to evaluate the effect of both geometric and intensity transformation-based data augmentations. We found that high-contrast intensity transformation-based data augmentation decreased segmentation accuracy, while low-contrast intensity transformation-based data augmentation significantly improved Recall and Dice. Additionally, combining geometric and low-contrast intensity transformation-based data augmentations, through an OR operation on their results, further enhanced segmentation accuracy, achieving improvements of 9.7% in Recall and 3.3% in Dice. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of low-contrast intensity transformation-based data augmentation in improving volumetric segmentation of hepatic vascular networks from ultrasound volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39939404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.