ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-classification deep neural network for cancer type identification from high-dimension, small-sample and imbalanced gene microarray data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing spread of the invasive spotted lanternfly via texture-based automated egg detection.Frontiers in insect science · 2026Article
- Integrating image processing with deep convolutional neural networks for gene selection and cancer classification using microarray data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based automated detection of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma in histopathology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene microarray technology provides an efficient way to diagnose cancer. However, microarray gene expression data face the challenges of high-dimension, small-sample, and multi-class imbalance. The coupling of these challenges leads to inaccurate results when using traditional feature selection and classification algorithms. Due to fast learning speed and good classification performance, deep neural network such as generative adversarial network has been proven one of the best classification algorithms, especially in bioinformatics domain. However, it is limited to binary application and inefficient in processing high-dimensional sparse features. This paper proposes a multi-classification generative adversarial network model combined with features bundling (MGAN-FB) to handle the coupling of high-dimension, small-sample, and multi-class imbalance for gene microarray data classification at both feature and algorithmic levels. At feature level, a deep encoder structure combining feature bundling (FB) mechanism and squeeze and excite (SE) mechanism, is designed for the generator. So, the sparsity, correlation and consequence of high-dimension features are all taken into consideration for adaptive features extraction. It achieves effective dimensionality reduction without transitional information loss. At algorithmic level, a softmax module coupled with multi-classifier are introduced into the discriminator, with a new objective function is distinctively designed for the proposed MGAN-FB model, considering encode loss, reconstruction loss, discrimination loss and multi-classification loss. We extend generative adversaria framework from the binary classification to the multi-classification field. Experiments are performed on eight open-source gene microarray datasets from classification performance, running time and non-parametric tests, which demonstrate that the proposed method has obvious advantages over other 7 compared methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.