Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39939367›Full record

ReviewMolecular systems biology2025

Leveraging prior knowledge to infer gene regulatory networks from single-cell RNA-sequencing data.

Marco Stock, Corinna Losert, Matteo Zambon, Niclas Popp, Gabriele Lubatti, Eva Hörmanseder, Matthias Heinig, Antonio Scialdone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular systems biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marco StockHelmholtz Center Munich Institute of Epigenetics und Stem Cells, Munich, Germany.
Corinna Losert *Helmholtz Center Munich Institute of Computational Biology, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5997-4702
Matteo Zambon *Helmholtz Center Munich Institute of Epigenetics und Stem Cells, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6016-3952
Niclas PoppHelmholtz Center Munich Institute of Epigenetics und Stem Cells, Munich, Germany.
Gabriele LubattiHelmholtz Center Munich Institute of Epigenetics und Stem Cells, Munich, Germany.
Eva HörmansederHelmholtz Center Munich Institute of Epigenetics und Stem Cells, Munich, Germany.
Matthias HeinigHelmholtz Center Munich Institute of Computational Biology, Munich, Germany.
Antonio ScialdoneHelmholtz Center Munich Institute of Epigenetics und Stem Cells, Munich, Germany. antonio.scialdone@helmholtz-munich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4956-2843

Funding

Chan Zuckerberg Foundation 2019-202666Chan Zuckerberg Foundation 2021-237882Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 213249687Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) HO 6864/2-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SC280/2-1DZHK partner site project 81Z0600106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs), which are crucial for understanding complex cellular regulation. However, the inherent noise and sparsity of scRNA-seq data present significant challenges to accurate GRN inference. This review explores one promising approach that has been proposed to address these challenges: integrating prior knowledge into the inference process to enhance the reliability of the inferred networks. We categorize common types of prior knowledge, such as experimental data and curated databases, and discuss methods for representing priors, particularly through graph structures. In addition, we classify recent GRN inference algorithms based on their ability to incorporate these priors and assess their performance in different contexts. Finally, we propose a standardized benchmarking framework to evaluate algorithms more fairly, ensuring biologically meaningful comparisons. This review provides guidance for researchers selecting GRN inference methods and offers insights for developers looking to improve current approaches and foster innovation in the field.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHumansGene Regulatory Network InferenceGraph LearningPrior KnowledgeSingle-cell MultiomicsSingle-cell Transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39939367
PMCPMC11876610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.