ArticleScientific reports2025
Oxidative stress index-based scoring for prediction of long-term prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a multi-center prognostic model for predicting survival in non-small cell lung cancer using pulmonary and hematological data.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Free Radicals in Health and Disease.MedComm · 2025Review
- The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Colorectal Cancer Initiation and Progression: Perspectives on Theranostic Approaches.Cancers · 2025Review
- Commentary: Low expression of SOD and PRX4 as indicators of poor prognosis and systemic inflammation in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxidative stress has been implicated as a pivotal factor in the pathogenesis of numerous malignancies. However, the association between oxidative stress and the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) is not well elucidated. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 424 patients with CRCLM who underwent primary resection at the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Wuhan, between July 2013 and September 2018. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 300) and a test set (n = 124) in a 7:3 ratio.To develop the CRCLM-integrated Oxidative Stress Score (CLIOSS) for CRCLM, we utilized individual oxidative stress markers. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was employed to assess prognostic factors.To validate the predictive performance of CLIOSS, we constructed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values. Additionally, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and calibration plots were used to evaluate the clinical utility and predictive consistency of the model. The CLIOSS prognostic model was constructed based on the following variables and their corresponding β coefficients: 0.042 × total bilirubin (TBIL, µmol/L) + 0.032 × blood urea nitrogen (BUN, mmol/L) - 0.001 × uric acid (UA, µmol/L). Higher CLIOSS were associated with poorer OS (2.934;95% CI 2.167-3.974;P < 0.001) and DFS(2.707; 95% CI 2.000-3.664; P < 0.001. The 3-year OS AUC values were 0.803 in the training set and 0.851 in the testset, while the 3-year DFS AUC values were 0.892 and 0.898, respectively. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that both predictive models have significant clinical utility in practice. CLIOSS is a comprehensive prognostic index derived from oxidative stress markers, designed to predict long-term survival in patients with CRCLM. Our study shows that higher CLIOSS are significantly associated with poorer outcomes, making it an important tool for assessing patient risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.