ArticleScientific reports2025
Seven-year overall survival of trastuzumabe versus alternative systemic therapies in a Brazilian breast cancer cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ten-year subtype survival and systemic-therapy pathways analysis after breast-cancer recurrence in the LACRN MPBC multicountry cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analyzed breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab in Brazil's unified health system (SUS) from 2008 to 2015. A non-concurrent cohort study using SUS data applied propensity score matching to reduce bias between trastuzumab and non-trastuzumab groups. Survival probabilities were estimated via Kaplan-Meier, with subgroup analysis using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 20,852 patients, the overall survival rate was 92%, with 94% in the trastuzumab group and 90% in the non-trastuzumab group. Younger, black patients and those in the North region had poorer survival. Advanced disease stages and palliative treatments were linked to higher mortality, while adjuvant therapy and radiotherapy were protective. During follow-up, 8.1% of patients died, with better outcomes observed in the trastuzumab group (p < 0.0001). Late initiation of trastuzumab (after 16 months) improved survival, especially in early stages (I and II). Invasive tumors and stage IV disease were associated with worse prognoses. The study demonstrates trastuzumab's effectiveness in SUS, underscores survival disparities related to sociodemographic factors, and emphasizes the need for early detection, equitable access, and optimized treatment timelines to improve outcomes in public healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.