ArticleInternational dental journal2025
Aerosol Dispersion and Efficacy of Protective Strategies During Dental Procedures.
Article in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsAerosol generation during dental procedures poses significant risks due to the potential for transmitting aerosol-bound microorganisms, including those in dental unit waterlines. This study aimed to quantify aerosol dispersion at various distances from dental procedures using a high-speed electric handpiece, with a focus on the effectiveness of various aerosol mitigation strategies.
methodsEmploying a mannequin head with an artificial tooth (typodont), we simulated clinical settings without the use of saliva to solely assess the contribution of dental unit waterlines and mechanical factors to aerosol production. Measurements were taken using a spectrometer at distances of 0, 0.9, and 1.8 meters from the handpiece.
resultsThe results showed no significant difference in aerosol dispersion between 0.9 and 1.8 meters without evacuation. In contrast, the use of high-volume evacuators, particularly the Isolite system, significantly decreased aerosol dispersion across all distances.
conclusionWe found that any type of high-volume evacuator can decrease aerosol dispersion, but the use of Isolite was the most effective. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results from this study can influence choice of safety measures to minimize aerosol spread during dental procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.