ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026
Impact of the corneal epithelium on the corneal power using 3D raytracing with OCT data.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the best shape aspheric intraocular lens - A raytracing based optimisation study.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Objective assessment of accommodation with an accommodative intraocular lens: Development of methodology and case report.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Medical optics in medical physics: from photons to quantitative insight.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Repeatability of corneal curvature with the MS-39 anterior segment tomographer in a cataractous population.PloS one · 2025Article
- Normative Values on Stromal Curvature, Power and Corneal-Stromal Curvature Ratios From a Hybrid AS-OCT.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyObservational
- Stromal Curvature, Power and Corneal-Stromal Curvature Ratios From a Hybrid AS-OCT in Eyes With Keratoconus.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study the effects of corneal imaging and focusing using a raytracing simulation with 2 and 3 surface corneal models based on customized surface representations of corneal tomography data .
methodsRaytracing simulation using surface data for the epithelium (S1), stroma (S2) and endothelium (S3) extracted from MS-39 anterior segment tomographer CSV export files. Customized surface representations were derived using Gaussian Process Predictors, and rays traced through the cornea and a 3.5 mm aperture stop located 3.66 mm behind the corneal apex. 4 clinical examples were evaluated: A) after hyperopic LASIK, B) after myopic LASIK, C) keratoconus, and D) after PRK with postoperatively developed Salzmann nodules.
resultsThe raytracing based bundle focus and wavefront focus distances of the 2 surface (S1 and S3) and 3 surface cornea models (S1, S2 and S3) were comparable, whereas the paraxial focus derived from a 1 surface cornea (S1), 2 (S1 and S3) or 3 surface cornea (S1, S2 and S3) using floating best fit sphere representations for S1, S1 and S3 showed systematically lower / higher focal distance with B) / C) indicating an overestimation / underestimation of corneal power with paraxial calculations.
conclusionsThe clinical examples in this study exhibited only minor differences between the mono- and dual layer cornea models. We recommend verification in a larger clinical study. Three surface corneal raytracing models could be of clinical relevance in intraocular lens calculations and LASIK ablation nomograms, offering potential improvements over paraxial calculations especially in cases with surface irregularities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.