ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Realistic fundus photograph generation for improving automated disease classification.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aims to investigate whether denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) could generate realistic retinal images, and if they could be used to improve the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) ensemble for multiple retinal disease classification, which was previously shown to outperform human experts.
methodsWe trained DDPMs to generate retinal fundus images representing diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma or normal eyes. Eight board-certified ophthalmologists evaluated 96 test images to assess the realism of generated images and classified them based on disease labels. Subsequently, between 100 and 1000 generated images were employed to augment training of deep convolutional ensembles for classifying retinal disease. We measured the accuracy of ophthalmologists in correctly identifying real and generated images. We also measured the classification accuracy, F-score and area under the receiver operating curve of a trained CNN in classifying retinal diseases from a test set of 100 fundus images.
resultsOphthalmologists exhibited a mean accuracy of 61.1% (range: 51.0%-68.8%) in differentiating real and generated images. Augmenting the training set with 238 generated images in the smallest class statistically significantly improved the F-score and accuracy by 5.3% and 5.8%, respectively (p<0.01) in a retinal disease classification task, compared with a baseline model trained only with real images.
conclusionsLatent diffusion models generated highly realistic retinal images, as validated by human experts. Adding generated images to the training set improved performance of a CNN ensemble without requiring additional real patient data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.