ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Daily SARS-CoV-2 testing after travel-related close contact notifications during elite sporting events hosted in the UK: a longitudinal study.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolation requirements for COVID-19 close contacts risked discouraging elite athletes and support staff from travelling to international sports events hosted in the UK during 2021.
objectivesThe purpose of this study, in collaboration with the UK Health Security Agency, was to develop and implement a risk assessment and workplace daily testing approach in elite sporting events, for individuals who would otherwise be excluded by quarantine.
methodsLongitudinal study of athletes and staff identified as close contacts during travel (ie, flights, train) to specific international sports events. A risk assessment was undertaken, and participants were categorised as at 'low' or 'high' risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 based on their exposure circumstances. High-risk individuals remained in 10-day isolation, whereas those of low risk underwent daily symptom and lateral flow testing, enhanced workplace mitigation and selected work activities were permitted.
resultsOf 29 514 event personnel, 202 travel-related close contacts were reported to the study team, of which 126 were eligible from 40 events in 7 sports. Of the individuals assessed, 105 (83.3%) were classified as low risk, while 21 (16.7%) were classified as high risk. No low-risk individuals tested positive in over 280 rapid antigen tests.
conclusionInternational sports events rely on athlete and support staff availability, with economic consequences of event cancellation or postponement. Our study showed no detection of SARS-CoV-2 in low-risk close contacts, and enabled their sustained participation. This multidisciplinary intervention appears to have been effective, enabling large-scale event continuation, while minimising risk to athletes, employees and the wider public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.