ArticleBMJ open2025
Role of general practitioner-led rural community hospitals in Sweden: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating Performance, Functional Outcomes, and Patient Autonomy in a Rural Community Hospital: A Real-Life Descriptive Cohort Study of Territorial Intermediate Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Balancing specialist roles with generalist responsibilities in primary care: have we gone too far?Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore rural general practitioners' (GPs') experiences of providing care in rural community hospitals (CHs) in northern Sweden.
designAn interview study, using qualitative content analysis.
settingThe study was conducted in Norrbotten and Västerbotten counties in Sweden and included eight rural CHs.
participantsSemi-structured interviews were conducted in 2018 with 15 rural GPs.
resultsTwo themes were identified: 'Being the hub in the patient's healthcare pathway' and 'Offering person-centred care far from hospital'. CHs are suitable for elderly, multimorbid and end-of-life patients, emphasising proximity, familiarity and discharge planning. They serve as primary care and intermediate hospital care hubs, collaborating with general hospitals and municipal caregivers. The rural GPs interviewed, as generalists, value holistic hospital patient care, and benefit from longitudinal patient knowledge. They highlighted these advantages and the cost-effectiveness of the CH model, arguing that it should be extended to urban regions. The rural GPs described their work situation as stimulating, but role conflicts in tight-knit communities, geographical distances and limited medical resources pose rural-specific ethical dilemmas.
conclusionsRural GPs value the holistic generalist perspective of CH care and emphasise the high-quality care that the CH setting enables them to provide. Despite rural-specific ethical dilemmas, they value the CH model and are concerned about its closures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.