Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39938955›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

ENIGMA-shock: protocol for a study framEwork for aN InteGrated assessMent of cArdiac rehabilitation programmes in patients acutely managed for cardiogenic shock.

Nuccia Morici, Emanuela Foglia, Lucreazia Ferrario, Paolo Pedersini, Marco Corda, Amelia Ravera, Letizia M Oreni, Ignazio Cusmano, Laura Garatti, Anastasia Toccafondi and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06572826 (A framEwork for aN InteGrated assessMent of cArdiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients Acutely Managed for Cardiogenic Shock - ENIGMA-shock), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06572826 recruitingnot on this map

A framEwork for aN InteGrated assessMent of cArdiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients Acutely Managed for Cardiogenic Shock - ENIGMA-shock

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2024 to 2026Enrolled2,000ConditionsCardiogenic ShockArmsCardiac Rehabilitation intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nuccia MoriciCardiac Rehabilitation, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milano, Italy nmorici@dongnocchi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-8857
Emanuela FogliaUniversità Carlo Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy.
Lucreazia FerrarioUniversità Carlo Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy.
Paolo PedersiniCardiac Rehabilitation, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milano, Italy.
Marco CordaAzienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy.
Amelia RaveraAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria 'San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona' Plesso 'Ruggi', Salerno, Campania, Italy.
Letizia M OreniCardiac Rehabilitation, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milano, Italy.
Ignazio CusmanoCardiac Rehabilitation, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milano, Italy.
Laura GarattiNiguarda Hospital De Gasperis Cardio Center, Milan, Lombardy, Italy.
Anastasia ToccafondiCardiac Rehabilitation, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milano, Italy.
Alice SaccoNiguarda Hospital De Gasperis Cardio Center, Milan, Lombardy, Italy.
Fabrizio OlivaNiguarda Hospital De Gasperis Cardio Center, Milan, Lombardy, Italy.
Andrea GarasciaASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Simone FreaOspedale Molinette, Torino, Piemonte, Italy.
Massimo PistonoMaugeri Clinical Research Institutes IRCCS Veruno, Veruno, Piemonte, Italy.
Daniela AschieriCardiology, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Guido TavazziFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Lombardia, Italy.
Federico PappalardoPoliclinico Morgagni, Catania, Sicilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) has been focused historically on single interventions (medical treatments, percutaneous and surgical interventions and, more recently, various temporary mechanical circulatory supports). However, none of these interventions has significantly changed the short-term prognosis of CS. Moreover, considerable interest in interventions applied in the acute setting has not been matched with comprehensive assessment of patients' long-term follow-up, not only for survival and rehospitalisation but also for quality of life and functional status, recovery from critical illness and its destructive sequelae, and a global evaluation of the overall sustainability of pathways of care. To fill this knowledge gap, the ENIGMA study will be conducted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective and retrospective multicentre registry conducted under the scientific coordination of the IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi and funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (PNRR-MCNT2-2023-12377767). Data referring to 2000 patients included in the Altshock registry, the largest multicentre CS registry in Italy, will be analysed. A standardised protocol of high-intensity cardiac rehabilitation has been defined and will be followed by the involved institutions after the inclusion of the first 1000 patients. Where feasible, this new pathway will be implemented in every institution. All the patients enrolled will be evaluated according to the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and a questionnaire on the patient experience at 6-month follow-up, to evaluate real-life comparative effects on patient outcomes and experiences. In conclusion, a health technology assessment (HTA) analysis, grounded in the EUnetHTA Core Model, will be conducted to define the potential multidimensional benefits and effects with regard to the overall economic, organisational and social sustainability of the innovative dedicated pathway. Various data sources will be used to conduct the HTA: (1) literature evidence, to define the evidence-based comparative indicators considering both surgical approaches; (2) real-world anonymised data from the hospitals included in the study, to enable costing of the rehabilitative pathways; and (3) healthcare professionals' perceptions, defining the perceived added value of the innovative pathway versus the historical one, based on an evaluation scale ranging from -3 to +3. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committee (EC) of Lombardy Region (CET 44/24), on 28 May 2024, and is under evaluation by the EC of three other centres. The study protocol will be evaluated for ethics by 10 more centres in January 2025. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed publications and disseminated through conference presentations. The Associazione Nazionale Scompensati Cardiaci (AISC; 'National Association of Patients with Heart Failure'), the Progetto Vita initiative and the non-profit organisation 'Heart Helps Heart' have endorsed the project and will be involved in disseminating information about the project and its outcomes to the general public. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The ENIGMA-shock study has been registered at ClincialTrials.gov: NCT06572826.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationShock, CardiogenicHumansItalyMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRegistriesResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesCardiovascular DiseaseHeart failureREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID39938955
PMCPMC11822428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.