ArticleNeurobiology of disease2025
Impairment in the homeostatic recruitment of layer 5/6 neurons following whisker stimulation in Fmr1 KO mice.
Article in Neurobiology of disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network Activity Shapes Inhibitory Synaptic Development in the Mouse Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mouse models of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) have demonstrated impairments in sensory-evoked neuronal firing of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Homeostatic plasticity does not compensate for these changes in activity. Previous work has shown that impairments in homeostatic plasticity mechanisms are observed in FXS, including deficits in synaptic scaling and intrinsic excitability. Here, we aimed to examine how sensory integration changes in vivo following a homeostatic perturbation, unilateral whisker deprivation (WD), in an Fmr1 knock out (KO) mouse model. We used multi-electrode array recordings of neurons in the lightly anesthetized juvenile mouse somatosensory cortex, and found that whisker-evoked responses in layer 5/6 (L5/6) excitatory neurons were weaker in the KO compared to the wild-type (WT). We show that WD in the WT leads to a compensatory increase in the proportion of L5/6 somatosensory neurons that were recruited following whisker stimulation, but this did not occur in the KO. On the other hand, certain compensatory responses were observed in the KO following WD; the firing rate of the whisker-responsive neurons was increased following both a 2- and 7-day WD. Similar to excitatory neurons, we observed increased recruitment of fast spiking (presumed inhibitory) neurons following WD in the WT, but not KO. Our results suggest that certain homeostatic mechanisms are impaired in the KO, while others appear to remain intact. Compromised homeostatic plasticity in development could influence adult sensory processing and long-term cortical organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.