Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39938476›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2025

Association of ventilation volumes, pressures and rates with the mechanical power of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: exploring the impact of rate reduction.

Laura A Buiteman-Kruizinga, David M P van Meenen, Ary Serpa Neto, Guido Mazzinari, Lieuwe D J Bos, Pim L J van der Heiden, Frederique Paulus, Marcus J Schultz, NEBULAE, PReVENT and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura A Buiteman-KruizingaDepartment of Intensive Care, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9569-2462
David M P van MeenenDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers 'location AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ary Serpa NetoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care-Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Guido MazzinariDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Lieuwe D J BosDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers 'location AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pim L J van der HeidenDepartment of Intensive Care, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands.
Frederique PaulusDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers 'location AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers 'location AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
NEBULAE
PReVENT
RELAx
investigators

Funding

Amsterdam UMCDutch Lung FoundationDutch Lung Foundation and Health Holland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh mechanical power is associated with mortality in patients who are critically ill and require invasive ventilation. It remains uncertain which components of mechanical power - volume, pressure or rate - increase mechanical power the most.

methodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of a database containing individual patient data from three randomised clinical trials of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was mechanical power. We used linear regression; double stratification to create subgroups of participants; and mediation analysis to assess the impact of changes in volumes, pressures and rates on mechanical power.

resultsA total of 1732 patients were included and analysed. The median (IQR [range]) mechanical power was 12.3 (9.3-17.1 [3.7-50.1]) J.min DISCUSSION: In this cohort of patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, pressure and respiratory rate were the most important determinants of mechanical power. The respiratory rate may be the most attractive ventilator setting to adjust when targeting a lower mechanical power.

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialRespiratory RateAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Distress SyndromeTidal Volumedriving pressurelung‐protective ventilationmechanical powermechanical ventilationrespiratory rate

Identifiers

PMID39938476
PMCPMC11987796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.