ArticleAddictive behaviors2025
Modes of cannabis use, frequency of use, and cannabis use problems: A latent profile analysis of modes of cannabis use.
Article in Addictive behaviors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modes of cannabis administration, cannabis and tobacco co-use, and associations with respiratory and cannabis use outcomes in a permissive medical cannabis state.Addictive behaviors · 2026Article
- Influence of cannabis potency on mental health outcomes among adolescents and young adults: scoping review.BJPsych open · 2026Review
- Cannabis modalities matter for momentary subjective drug effects.Addictive behaviors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile studies have linked different modes of cannabis use (CU) with CU problems and consequences, they have typically focused on unique effects of individual modes. Few studies have examined more complex patterns (e.g., using multiple modes). Studies that have typically combine modes and frequency of use, making it impossible to determine whether differences between patterns of use result from differing modes or differing frequencies of use.
methodsWe used data from 338 sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals (18-25 years old) who used cannabis (populations at high risk for CU disorder) to identify groups based on their modes of CU and examine associations between mode-based groups on CU frequency and consequences.
resultsFour groups were identified: smoking [reference], vaping concentrates, edible use, and multiple modes of use. Those who predominately used edibles tended to engage in less frequent CU and reported fewer problems compared to those who predominately smoked cannabis. Individuals who predominately vaped concentrates experienced more problems and more frequent CU at follow-up compared to those who predominately smoked cannabis, controlling for CU problems and frequency at baseline. Using multiple modes per day was not associated with frequency or problems.
conclusionsLower CU problems identified among those who predominately used edibles were attributed to their lower frequency CU. Findings also indicate that vaping concentrates may be associated with increasing cannabis frequency and consequences. As the study sample was comprised of sexual minority women and gender diverse young adults, future research should determine whether results generalize to other populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.