Observational studyPloS one2025
Influence of inspiratory muscle strength on 6-minute walk distance in patients with acute heart failure.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exercise-related interventions for cardiopulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of different modes of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation delivery for patients with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inspiratory muscle weakness may affect exercise tolerance; however, the relationship between inspiratory muscle strength and the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively investigate the association between inspiratory muscle strength at the start of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and 6MWD at discharge in patients with AHF. This single-center, retrospective, observational study enrolled 275 patients with AHF who underwent CR. Patients unable to walk before admission, with isometric knee extensor strength/weight (%IKES) < 0.3 kgf/kg at the start of CR, or unable to undergo examination were excluded. Maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (PI-max) was used as an indicator of inspiratory muscle strength and was measured at the start of CR. The measured PI-max was divided by the predicted value and used for analysis (%PI-max). The primary outcome was 6MWD, an indicator of exercise tolerance, and was measured at discharge. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple regression analysis, with 6MWD at discharge as the dependent variable and %PI-max at the start of CR as the independent variable. Covariates were age, New York Heart Association class, physical frailty, and %IKES at the start of CR. The final analysis included 94 patients (median age 83.0 years, 57.5% male). Multiple regression analysis showed that %PI-max at the start of CR was significantly associated with 6MWD at discharge even after adjustment for covariates (β = 0.223, 95% confidence interval: 0.063-0.382, p = 0.007). PI-max was a factor associated with 6MWD at discharge in patients with AHF. In conclusion, increased inspiratory muscle strength may contribute to improved 6MWD in patients with AHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.