ArticlePloS one2025
Caesarean section delivery and its associated factors in Ghana: A multilevel analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geospatial inequalities and determinants of caesarean section delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis.Global health action · 2026Article
- Prevalence of wound infections and related antimicrobial resistance in Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Determinants of Caesarean Section Deliveries in Ghana: A Population-Based Cross-sectional Study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Prediction of caesarean section birth using machine learning algorithms among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven if the ideal rate for caesarean section (CS) is considered 10-15%, worldwide CS rates have been steadily increasing, without significant additional benefit to women's health. Its overuse was associated with maternal and fetal complications. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the rate of CS delivery and associated factors among women delivered in health facilities in Ghana.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2022 DHS datasets from Ghana. A total of 5231 weighted samples were included. STATA.16 was used for analysis. A multilevel logistic regression was applied. An adjusted odds ratio with a 95% CI and a p-value < 0.05 was used to declare significantly associated factors.
resultThe prevalence of CS in Ghana was 20.29% [95% CI = 19.23-21.41%]. Age 25-34 [AOR = 1.32, CI: 1.04, 1.68] and 35 + [AOR = 1.57, CI: 1.16, 2.11], primary [AOR = 1.58, CI: 1.21, 2.07], secondary [AOR = 1.36, CI: 1.07, 1.73], and higher [AOR = 2.24, CI: 1.58, 3.17] education, richer [AOR = 1.45, CI: 1.06, 1.99] and richest [AOR = 2.35, CI: 1.63, 3.39] wealth index, employment [AOR = 0.77, CI: 0.64, 0.92], primiparous [AOR = 1.33, CI: 1.07, 1.67], giving first birth after the age of 35 [AOR = 4.58, CI: 1.88, 11.19], multiple pregnancy [AOR = 5.53, CI: 4.02, 7.62], large birth size [AOR = 1.25, CI: 1.06, 1.48], 4-6 kg birth weight [AOR = 2.13, CI: 1.55, 2.92], as well as residing in Volta [AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.22, 3.22] and Bono East [AOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.28, 3.19] regions were significant factors associated with CS delivery in Ghana.
conclusionThe rate of CS was higher than previous studies in Ghana and the WHO recommended level, making it a public health concern. Age, education, wealth, employment, parity, age at first birth, pregnancy type, birth size, birth weight, and region were significantly associated with CS. Therefore, strategies aimed at examining guidelines for proper indications and uses of CS may lead to an improvement CS rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.