ArticleBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2025
Comparison of Two Coronary Anastomosis Techniques in Terms of Flow Rate in Porcine Hearts.
Article in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe quality of coronary anastomoses is one of the important parameters that may affect graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Therefore, we compared two different anastomotic techniques to improve graft flow and patency rates.
methodsThis study was conducted by performing two different fashions of anastomosis with a human saphenous vein graft on 24 various coronary segments of five postmortem porcine hearts. Each arteriotomy was used for both anastomotic techniques. In the first method, epicardial fat tissue around the coronary artery was involved to the saphenous vein anastomosis line (coronary wall and epicardial fat tissue [CWE] technique). In the second method, the saphenous vein graft was sutured to the coronary wall only, without involving epicardial fat tissue (only coronary wall [OCW] technique).The time it tookfor 30 cc of 0.9% isotonic saline solution to pass through the anastomosis in a free-flow fashion by gravity was measured following each technique. Additionally, the anastomotic areas in mm2 were measured and compared between the two techniques.
resultsThe mean flow time for the CWE technique was 77.5 ± 21.4 seconds, whereas for the OCW technique, it was 87.2 ± 19.5 seconds (P<0.001). The flow rates were 23.2 ml/min and 20.6 ml/min, respectively. The anastomotic area was 3.947 mm2 for the CWE technique and 1.430 mm2 for the OCW technique.
conclusionWhen the sutures penetrate both the epicardial fat tissue and the coronary artery wall simultaneously, a larger anastomosis area can be created. Consequently, potentially better graft flow and hemodynamic performance could be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.