ArticlePloS one2025
Efficacy of early enteral nutrition support on the nutritional status of patients after gallstone surgery.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-Cholecystectomy nutritional management: a comprehensive review of evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the overall efficacy of early enteral nutrition support on the nutritional status of patients following gallstone surgery, providing a theoretical basis for its application in postoperative care.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 98 hospitalized patients who underwent gallstone surgery between February 2021 and March 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: the study group, which received early nutritional intervention, and the control group, which started nutritional support three days post-surgery. The primary objective was to assess nutritional status, while secondary objectives included gastrointestinal function, immune function markers, and the incidence of postoperative and gastrointestinal complications. Nutritional status, gastrointestinal function, immune function, and complications were compared between the two groups before and one week after intervention.
resultsAfter the intervention, the study group showed significantly higher levels of total protein (TP), prealbumin (PAB), albumin (ALB), transferrin (TF), and body mass index (BMI) compared to the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the scores for Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) were notably lower in the study group (P<0.05). Postoperatively, the study group experienced shorter times to first exhaust, defecation, bowel sound recovery, first meal, and overall hospital stay compared to the control group (P<0.05). Although the pre-intervention levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8+ were comparable between the groups (P>0.05), these immune markers were significantly higher in the study group post-intervention (P<0.05). The incidence of both postoperative and gastrointestinal complications was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (both P<0.05).
conclusionEarly enteral nutrition support significantly improves the nutritional status of patients after gallstone surgery, enhances gastrointestinal and immune function, and reduces the occurrence of complications. These findings underscore its clinical significance and value in postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.