SynthesisPloS one2025
Electronic health record in military healthcare systems: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Violet teaming as a resilient framework for bridging civilian-military electronic health record interoperability.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe immediate access to detailed patient data is vital for effective medical care in military and emergency scenarios, enhancing diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of military personnel. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) is urgently needed in military healthcare systems, despite the distinct hurdles involved. Current literature on EHR use in military healthcare is lacking and disjointed. This study aims to bridge this gap through a systematic review, offering a thorough examination of the advantages, obstacles, and recommended strategies for implementing EHRs in military healthcare environments. MATERIALS AND
methodsAccording to the PRISMA guideline, a comprehensive electronic search of all relevant literature on the topic was carried out across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE, ProQuest, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, SID, and ISC up to July 20, 2024. The inclusion criteria involved choosing English-language articles that were available in full text and closely aligned with the study's objectives. The data extraction sheet for each study included information including the authors, publication year, country, research goals, architecture and components, context, processes involved, standards utilized, platform and technology, level of implementation, interoperability issues, challenges faced, information resources, and significant findings.
resultsA total of 9,618 titles were retrieved from different databases. After removing duplicates, 6,051 titles were left. Upon evaluation, 29 articles were chosen for inclusion in the review. The results show that most of the studies were carried out at the United States Department of Defense (DoD) level with the aim of improving the quality of care and patient safety, as well as integrating healthcare delivery. Additionally, the studies covered various processes such as clinical documentation, appointment scheduling, research, telemedicine, decision support, and computerized physician order entry. Health level seven fast healthcare interoperability resources (HL7 FHIR), clinical document architecture (CDA), health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA), international classification of diseases 10th and 9th revision (ICD 10, ICD 9), international organization for standardization technical committees (ISO TC), software development kits (SDKs), and web-based architecture are some of the most important requirements for implementing EHR. The most significant challenges reported in the implementation of EHR included concerns about privacy and security, the sensitive military deployment environment, infrastructure limitations, and interoperability concerns.
conclusionsPolicymakers and practitioners can get insight from the findings regarding the standards that must be met, the challenges that must be overcome, and the requirements for EHR implementation in military healthcare settings. It could be a useful starting point when implementing EHRs in military healthcare systems, especially in nations where e-health development and planning are still in their early stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.