Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39937738›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Bacterial profiles of the oral, vaginal, and rectal mucosa and colostrum of periparturient sows.

Virpi Piirainen, Emilia König, Aleksi Husso, Mari Heinonen, Antti Iivanainen, Tiina Pessa-Morikawa, Mikael Niku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virpi PiirainenDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Emilia KönigDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-1400
Aleksi HussoDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-2759
Mari HeinonenDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-0692
Antti IivanainenDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-3225
Tiina Pessa-MorikawaDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5992-8442
Mikael NikuDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1087-9859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The commensal microbiota influences the health, feeding efficiency, and reproductive performance of sows. The microbiota composition in the alimentary and genitourinary tracts and in colostrum/milk during pregnancy and lactation also impacts the microbiota and immune system, growth, and health of the piglets. Knowledge of the microbial compositions is important for evaluation of these effects and for discovering ways to improve the health and productivity of the sows. Oral, vaginal, and rectal mucosa and colostrum were sampled from 32 sows of variable parity in late pregnancy, and colostrum within 6 hours of delivery of the first piglet, on four commercial piglet-producing farms in Finland. Microbial compositions were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The most abundant genera of the oral microbiota were Rothia, Moraxella, and Streptococcus. The rectal microbiota was dominated by Clostridium sensu stricto 1. Streptococcus was the most abundant genus in the vagina and colostrum. Moderate differences in diversity and composition were observed between farms. The relative abundances of the genera Neisseria (MaAsLin 2 q = 0.002, ANCOMBC q = 0.005), Fusobacterium (MaAsLin 2 q = 0.008, ANCOMBC q = 0.04) and Bacteroides (MaAsLin 2 q < 0.005, ANCOMBC q = 0.06) were lower in oral samples and Romboutsia (MaAsLin 2 q = 0.07, ANCOMBC q = 0.05), Turicibacter (MaAsLin 2 q = 0.08, ANCOMBC q = 0.02) and Lachnospiraceae_UCG_007 (MaAsLin 2 q = 0.1, ANCOMBC q = 0.05) were higher in rectal samples of multiparous compared to primiparous sows. In vaginal samples there was a tendency of higher relative abundances of the genera Fusobacterium and Streptococcus in multiparous than primiparous sows. Among the differentially abundant taxa, F. necrophorum and F. nucleatum were identified in oral samples, F. gastrosuis and F. necrophorum in vaginal samples, and S. dysgalactiae in colostrum samples. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the mucosal and colostrum microbiota of periparturient sows during normal production conditions on Finnish commercial farms.

Indexed as

BacteriaColostrumMicrobiotaMouth MucosaMucous MembraneRectumVaginaAnimalsFemaleFinlandMouthPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID39937738
PMCPMC11819496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.