ArticlePloS one2025
Designing of a multiepitope-based vaccine against echinococcosis utilizing the potent Ag5 antigen: Immunoinformatics and simulation approaches.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development and protective efficacy of multi-epitope vaccine FL46 against cystic echinococcosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Novel fungal metabolites as dual cholinesterase inhibitors: A computational approach for Alzheimer's disease therapy.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Echinococcosis is a significant parasitic zoonotic disease with severe implications for human and animal health. To date, there has been no effective vaccine candidate available for echinococcosis. Therefore, we employed computational approaches to develop a multiepitope-based vaccine using the most potent epitopes of MHC-I, MHC-II, and B-cell derived from the Ag5 protein of Echinococcus spp. The final vaccine construct containing the epitopes, linkers, and adjuvant exhibited potent antigenicity (score > 0.1) with no evidence of allergenicity (score < 0) and toxicity (score < 0) in several computational platforms. The vaccine also exhibited favorable physicochemical characteristics such as being highly soluble (SOLpro score of 0.781243) and hydrophilic (Grand average of hydropathy of -0.433). Moreover, the tertiary structure of the vaccine was also found to be structurally stable, with a Z score of -5.71. Further, the molecular docking analysis confirmed the vaccine's significant binding affinity to the RP-105 (docking score of -1252.7) and TLR-9 (docking score of -970.9). The molecular dynamic simulations confirmed the structural stability of the docked complexes under a virtual physiological system. The negative ΔTOTAL values derived from the MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA analyses confirmed a spontaneous and thermodynamically favorable binding process between the vaccine and receptors. Moreover, the vaccine demonstrated high potentiality to elicit both innate (natural killer cell, dendritic and macrophage) and adaptive (B-cell, helper T cell and cytotoxic T cell) immune responses with sustained humoral immune responses evidenced by increased IFN-γ and IL-2 levels. Following codon optimization and in silico cloning, the vaccine was successfully expressed (CAI value of 0.9607 and average GC content of 52.34%) after being inserted into the pET-28a (+) plasmid of E. coli. These findings highlight the potential of the designed vaccine candidate to combat echinococcosis and lay the groundwork for future preclinical and clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.