ArticlePloS one2025
Monkeys can identify pictures from words.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans learn and incorporate cross-modal associations between auditory and visual objects (e.g., between a spoken word and a picture) into language. However, whether nonhuman primates can learn cross-modal associations between words and pictures remains uncertain. We trained two rhesus macaques in a delayed cross-modal match-to-sample task to determine whether they could learn associations between sounds and pictures of different types. In each trial, the monkeys listened to a brief sound (e.g., a monkey vocalization or a human word), and retained information about the sound to match it with one of 2-4 pictures presented on a touchscreen after a 3-second delay. We found that the monkeys learned and performed proficiently in over a dozen associations. In addition, to test their ability to generalize, we exposed them to sounds uttered by different individuals. We found that their hit rate remained high but more variable, suggesting that they perceived the new sounds as equivalent, though not identical. We conclude that rhesus monkeys can learn cross-modal associations between objects of different types, retain information in working memory, and generalize the learned associations to new objects. These findings position rhesus monkeys as an ideal model for future research on the brain pathways of cross-modal associations between auditory and visual objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.