Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39937708›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Monkeys can identify pictures from words.

Elizabeth Cabrera-Ruiz, Marlen Alva, Mario Treviño, Miguel Mata-Herrera, José Vergara, Tonatiuh Figueroa, Javier Perez-Orive, Luis Lemus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth Cabrera-RuizDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
Marlen AlvaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
Mario TreviñoLaboratorio de Plasticidad Cortical y Aprendizaje Perceptual, Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-5214
Miguel Mata-HerreraDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
José VergaraDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Tonatiuh FigueroaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6689-7304
Javier Perez-OriveBasic Neurosciences, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, "Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra" Mexico City, México.
Luis LemusDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6608-3684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans learn and incorporate cross-modal associations between auditory and visual objects (e.g., between a spoken word and a picture) into language. However, whether nonhuman primates can learn cross-modal associations between words and pictures remains uncertain. We trained two rhesus macaques in a delayed cross-modal match-to-sample task to determine whether they could learn associations between sounds and pictures of different types. In each trial, the monkeys listened to a brief sound (e.g., a monkey vocalization or a human word), and retained information about the sound to match it with one of 2-4 pictures presented on a touchscreen after a 3-second delay. We found that the monkeys learned and performed proficiently in over a dozen associations. In addition, to test their ability to generalize, we exposed them to sounds uttered by different individuals. We found that their hit rate remained high but more variable, suggesting that they perceived the new sounds as equivalent, though not identical. We conclude that rhesus monkeys can learn cross-modal associations between objects of different types, retain information in working memory, and generalize the learned associations to new objects. These findings position rhesus monkeys as an ideal model for future research on the brain pathways of cross-modal associations between auditory and visual objects.

Indexed as

Macaca mulattaVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39937708
PMCPMC11819547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.