ArticleGigaScience2025
Unlocking the power of AI for phenotyping fruit morphology in Arabidopsis.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- From data to decisions: a paradigm shift in fruit agriculture through the integration of multi-omics, modern phenotyping, and cutting-edge bioinformatic tools.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based approaches for weed detection in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning can revolutionise high-throughput image-based phenotyping by automating the measurement of complex traits, a task that is often labour-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. However, its precision and adaptability in accurately phenotyping organ-level traits, such as fruit morphology, remain to be fully evaluated. Establishing the links between phenotypic and genotypic variation is essential for uncovering the genetic basis of traits and can also provide an orthologous test of pipeline effectiveness. In this study, we assess the efficacy of deep learning for measuring variation in fruit morphology in Arabidopsis using images from a multiparent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) mapping family. We trained an instance segmentation model and developed a pipeline to phenotype Arabidopsis fruit morphology, based on the model outputs. Our model achieved strong performance with an average precision of 88.0% for detection and 55.9% for segmentation. Quantitative trait locus analysis of the derived phenotypic metrics of the MAGIC population identified significant loci associated with fruit morphology. This analysis, based on automated phenotyping of 332,194 individual fruits, underscores the capability of deep learning as a robust tool for phenotyping large populations. Our pipeline for quantifying pod morphological traits is scalable and provides high-quality phenotype data, facilitating genetic analysis and gene discovery, as well as advancing crop breeding research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.