Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39937584›Full record

ArticleCancer2025

Estimating cancer incidence attributable to physical inactivity in the United States.

Brigid M Lynch, Julie K Bassett, Roger L Milne, Alpa V Patel, Erika Rees-Punia, I-Min Lee, Steven C Moore, Charles E Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brigid M LynchCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-547X
Julie K BassettCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roger L MilneCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5764-7268
Alpa V PatelDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-1218
Erika Rees-PuniaDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-1578
I-Min LeeBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven C MooreMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Charles E MatthewsMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Victorian Cancer Agency MCRF18005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious estimates of the number of cancers attributable to physical inactivity in the United States have typically focused on only three malignancies (colon, endometrial, and postmenopausal breast cancer). Contemporary epidemiologic evidence suggests that physical inactivity could contribute to up to 15 types of cancer, and a dose-response effect has been demonstrated for 13 of these. This study estimated the number of cancers diagnosed in the United States in 2015 due to physical inactivity for these 13 sites.

methodsData from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate physical activity prevalence and, with the assumption of a 10-year latency period, 2015 cancer incidence data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Incidence US Cancer Statistics Public Use Database.

resultsThe potential impact fraction was estimated to be 4.1%, which meant that 30,951 of 761,625 incident cancers at the 13 sites could have been prevented in the United States in 2015 if adults had increased physical activity by one category in 2005 (approximately 7.5 additional metabolic equivalent task hours per week [MET-h/week]). Theoretically, 85,415 of 761,625 incident cancers at the 13 sites (population attributable fraction, 11.2%) could have been prevented if all adults had achieved the highest level of physical activity (>30 MET-h/week).

conclusionsWhen estimates are based on updated epidemiologic evidence regarding physical inactivity and cancer risk, substantially more cancers are attributable to physical inactivity than previously reported. A greater focus on physical activity promotion is warranted for cancer control in the United States.

Indexed as

ExerciseNeoplasmsSedentary BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSEER ProgramUnited StatesYoung Adultexerciseneoplasmspopulation attributable fractionpotential impact fraction

Identifiers

PMID39937584
PMCPMC11818651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.