ArticleJAMA network open2025
Research Domain Criteria in NIMH Grants Characterized Using Large Language Models.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model Systems infrastructure of the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG): toward an integrated, mechanism-based framework for mental health research.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Review
- A new approach to assessment for young children referred by education professionals for socio-emotional, behavioural, and cognitive difficulties.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- State and Diffusion of National Institutes of Health Funding of AI in Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- About Digitalisation and AI, Data Protection, Data Exchange, Data Mining-Legal Constraints/Challenges Concerning Sleep Medicine.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Over the past decade, the leadership of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has emphasized the importance of a transdiagnostic approach to psychiatric investigation using Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) mapping more closely to neurobiology. Objective: To investigate whether research support from the NIMH for individual RDoC domains and for transdiagnostic investigation has changed over time and has had differential impact in terms of publication, citations, or patent filings. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this longitudinal cohort study, all R01, R21, and R03 studies funded by the NIMH between January 2003 and December 2023 were identified via the National Institutes of Health RePORTER database. Their abstracts were characterized in terms of RDoC domains (negative valence, positive valence, cognition, social, arousal, and sensorimotor) using a large language model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were publications, citation impact estimated at 5 years from the index year of funding, and patents, examined using regression models adjusted for other grant characteristics. Results: Among 8897 R01, R03, and R21 projects, reflecting $17.7 billion of investment, abstracts of 3141 (35.3%) reflected negative valence; 1344 (15.1%), positive valence; 2781 (31.3%), cognition; 1607 (18.1%), social; 343 (3.9%), arousal; and 571 (6.4%), sensorimotor domains. A total of 1793 (20.2%) incorporated a transdiagnostic perspective. Positive and social domains were associated with fewer publications (difference, -1.13 [95% CI, -2.11 to -0.15] and -2.23 [95% CI, -3.15 to -1.30], respectively) and lesser citation impact (difference, -0.47 [95% CI, -0.75 to -0.18] and -1.19 [95% CI, -1.46 to -0.91], respectively) at 5 years. Social (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.23) and cognitive (AOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89) domains and transdiagnostic proposals (AOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.60) were associated with lower likelihood of patent filing. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of NIMH funding, grants reflecting different RDoC domains differed substantially in their scientific impact in terms of publications, citations, and patent generation. The findings suggest that large language models represent a promising approach to characterizing research proposals at scale, which may be useful in guiding resource allocation to maximize scientific return on investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.