Observational studyCommunity mental health journal2025
It's Like Adding a Drop of Ink to Milk and Shaking It: Newly Certified Peer Specialist Reflections on Lived Recovery Expertise and Professional Identity.
Observational study in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How participation in health promotion affects peer-experts and experts-by-experience from vulnerable neighborhoods: a case study from The Netherlands.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSelf-disclosure of lived recovery experiences is a cornerstone of peer support work. However, few studies have explored how early career certified peer specialists (CPSs) integrate or plan to integrate their own lived recovery experiences into their CPS work, or the challenges they expect to experience when doing so. In this qualitative study, we explore how early career CPSs use their lived recovery experience and challenges that accompany self-disclosure.
methodsQualitative data were collected as part of multistate, 3-year observational prospective cohort study of CPS graduate employment trajectories. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a subsample of early-career CPSs about their transition to the workforce; this study reports on interview material focused on how participants use and expect to use their recovery experiences. Data were analyzed using thematic and content analysis informed by constant comparative methods.
resultsN = 25 individuals participated in an interview. While participants generally felt positive about sharing their personal recovery stories in their CPS role, some reported potential challenges they expect to experience, such as misalignment of recovery experiences or being re-traumatized when sharing their recovery stories with clients and coworkers.
conclusionThat study participants held mixed feelings about sharing lived experience suggests that the peer support workforce needs early career professional support, such as peer-to-peer supervision models that focus on CPS wellbeing, in addition to job performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.