Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39937387›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2025

Causal Effect of Count Treatment on Ordinal Outcome Using Generalized Propensity Score: Application to Number of Antenatal Care and Age Specific Childhood Vaccination.

Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, Haile Mekonnen Fenta, Zelalem G Dessie, Temesgen T Zewotir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashagrie Sharew IyassuCollege of Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. statashe@gmail.com.
Haile Mekonnen FentaCollege of Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Zelalem G DessieCollege of Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Temesgen T ZewotirSchool of Mathematics, Statistics & Computer Science, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany of the studies in causal inference using propensity scores relied on binary treatments where it is estimated by logistic regression or machine learning algorithms. Since 2000s, attention has been given for multiple values (categorical) and continuous treatments and the propensity score associated with such treatments is called generalized propensity score (GPS). However, there is scant literature on the use of count treatments in causal inference. Besides, effective sample size, after weighting, along with other methods has not been practiced for GPS model performance measure. The study was done with the aim of using count treatments in causal inference; select appropriate GPS and outcome models for such treatment and ordinal outcome.

methodA family of count models and a generalized boosted model (GBM) were used for GPS estimation. Their performance was measured in terms of covariate balancing power, effective sample size and the average treatment effect after GPS-based weighting. Marginal structural modeling (MSM) and covariate adjustment using GPS were used to estimate treatment effect on ordinal outcome. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting was used for covariate balancing assessment. Monte Carlo simulation study at various sample sizes with 1000 replication and household survey data were used in the study.

resultGPS was trimmed at 1% and 99% which gave better results as compared to untrimmed results. The generalized boosted model performed well both in simulation and actual data producing a larger effective sample size and smaller metrics when estimating average treatment effect on the outcome. The MSM was found better than GPS as a covariate in the outcome model.

conclusionIt is important to trim GPS when it approaches zero or one without loss of more information due to trimming. Effective sample size after weighting should be used along with other methods such as correlation and absolute standardized mean differences for GPS model selection. GBM should be used for GPS estimation for count treatments. MSM is important for the outcome model when weighting GPS method is used. Finally, the number of antenatal care services had an increasing effect on the probability of age-specific childhood vaccination.

Indexed as

Prenatal CarePropensity ScoreVaccinationCausalityChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMonte Carlo MethodPregnancyAntenatal CareEffective sample sizeGeneralized propensity scoreMonte Carlos simulationOrdinal regression

Identifiers

PMID39937387
PMCPMC11822178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.