Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39937364›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025

Geographic differences in early-onset breast cancer incidence trends in the USA, 2001-2020, is it time for a geographic risk score?

Rebecca D Kehm, Josephine M Daaboul, Parisa Tehranifar, Mary Beth Terry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Young Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Why Is No One Telling Me to Get a Mammogram?Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca D KehmDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. rk2967@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-6799
Josephine M DaaboulDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Parisa TehranifarDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Characterizing the role of adolescent physical activity in early onset breast cancer risk for women across the familial risk continuumR00CA263024 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Rebecca D Kehm · 2024 to 2026
$847k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA263024NIH HHS R00CA263024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer (BC) incidence is increasing in US women under 40, with variation across racial and ethnic groups. It is not yet known if incidence trends also vary by geography within the USA, which may inform whether place-based exposures contribute to BC risk in younger women.

methodsUsing the US Cancer Statistics database, we analyzed age-adjusted BC incidence rates from 2001 to 2020 in women aged 25-39. We calculated the average annual percent change (AAPC) using Joinpoint regression and performed age-period-cohort analyses.

resultsFrom 2001 to 2020, BC incidence in women under 40 increased by more than 0.50% per year in 21 states, while remaining stable or decreasing in the other states. Incidence was 32% higher in the five states with the highest rates compared to the five states with the lowest rates. The Western region had the highest rate of increase (AAPC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-0.96), despite having the lowest absolute incidence rate from 2001 to 2020. The Northeast had the highest absolute rate of BC among women under 40 and experienced a significant increase over time (AAPC = 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.82). The South was the only region where BC under 40 did not increase from 2001 to 2020.

conclusionThese findings support that BC incidence trends in US women under 40 vary by geography, and the range of state-specific risks was comparable in magnitude to other risk measures, such as polygenic risk scores. This suggest that incorporating place-based factors alongside established risk factors into risk prediction may improve our ability to identify groups of younger women at higher risk for early-onset BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAge of OnsetFemaleHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesAge-period-cohort analysisCancer incidence trendsDisparitiesEarly-onset breast cancerGeographyYoung women

Identifiers

PMID39937364
PMCPMC12836471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.