Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Classification of fundus autofluorescence images based on macular function in retinitis pigmentosa using convolutional neural networks.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fundus Autofluorescence as a Sensitive Biomarker of Disease Progression in Bietti Crystalline Dystrophy.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Evolving Consultation: Enhancing Ophthalmic Diagnostic Performance Using Large Language Model.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Retinal Dystrophy and Evaluation of Gene Therapy Efficacy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Association between the retinal age gap and systemic diseases in the Japanese population: the Nagahama study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether convolutional neural networks (CNN) can classify the severity of central vision loss using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images and color fundus images of retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and to evaluate the utility of those images for severity classification. STUDY
designRetrospective observational study.
methodsMedical charts of patients with RP who visited Nagoya University Hospital were reviewed. Eyes with atypical RP or previous surgery were excluded. The mild group was comprised of patients with a mean deviation value of > - 10 decibels, and the severe group of < - 20 decibels, in the Humphrey field analyzer 10-2 program. CNN models were created by transfer learning of VGG16 pretrained with ImageNet to classify patients as either mild or severe, using FAF images or color fundus images.
resultsOverall, 165 patients were included in this study; 80 patients were classified into the severe and 85 into the mild group. The test data comprised 40 patients in each group, and the images of the remaining patients were used as training data, with data augmentation by rotation and flipping. The highest accuracies of the CNN models when using color fundus and FAF images were 63.75% and 87.50%, respectively.
conclusionUsing FAF images may enable the accurate assessment of central vision function in RP. FAF images may include more parameters than color fundus images that can evaluate central visual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.